New Research Shows Metal Exposure From Laundered Shop Towels May Exceed Permissible Levels Set by the EPA for Metals in Drinking Water

This is a follow up story on a previous post I published about the possible toxicity of laundered cloth shop towels. The video above was part of that post.

Presented at the Society of Toxicology Annual Meeting and ToxExpo, Gradient study advances research regarding metal residues, such as lead, on shop towels after commercial laundering

March 14, 2012, 8:30 a.m. EDT

SAN FRANCISCO, March 14, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ — Gradient, a nationally recognized environmental and risk science consulting firm, today presented new data that show metal exposure from use of laundered shop towels may exceed the permissible levels allowed in drinking water. Gradient presented a poster describing its findings at the annual Society of Toxicology Annual Meeting and ToxExpo, which is taking place from March 11 through 15 in San Francisco. The poster describes exposure to metals on shop towels and compares the exposure to toxicity criteria established by governmental agencies. Millions of manufacturing workers routinely use shop towels on the job.

According to the new research, manufacturing workers using a typical number of shop towels may be exposed to metals such as lead, chromium, cadmium and antimony at levels many times above those allowed by the maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) or, in the case of lead, the action level (AL) for drinking water. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgates drinking water standards under the Safe Water Drinking Act to protect public health. An MCL, or AL for lead, is a legally enforceable limit which drinking water must meet. Suppliers of drinking water such as municipalities must address exceedances of MCLs, or the AL for lead, by taking corrective action and informing consumers.

“Our analysis indicates that shop towel users may unknowingly ingest higher amounts of metals than what is allowed in drinking water,” said Barbara Beck, Ph.D., DABT, principal at Gradient. “It is important for safety managers and plant workers to understand metal contamination levels in laundered shop towels so they can make informed decisions about their use.”

Workers May Unknowingly Ingest Heavy Metals from Contaminated Shop Towels

As recognized by multiple federal agencies such as the U.S. EPA, people can transfer contaminants from their hands to their mouths and ultimately ingest the invisible residues. The new Gradient analysis presented at the Society of Toxicology meeting compares the potential for heavy metal ingestion from shop towels to levels that may be consumed in water at drinking water limits. In the case of lead, daily intake from shop towels may be up to 21 times higher than the intake that would be associated with the lead action level.

Freshly laundered shop towels have been shown to be contaminated with metal residues, which may transfer to the hand during common usage, and can migrate to the mouth and be ingested at levels which exceed those allowed in drinking water.

The MCL and AL analysis advances Gradient’s research, which has been ongoing since 2003. Gradient has found that workers using the typical number of shop towels daily were exposed to seven metals — antimony, beryllium, cadmium, cobalt, copper, lead and molybdenum — that may exceed health-based limits. The same study found heavy metal residues in all of the laundered shop towels tested.

Kimberly-Clark Professional commissioned the 2011 Gradient study and the research presented by Gradient at the Society of Toxicology meeting. Both studies are based on analysis of data from laundered shop towels submitted by 26 North American manufacturing companies to an independent testing lab.

For more information, go to http://www.thedirtonshoptowels.com/ .

About Gradient

Gradient is an environmental and risk science consulting firm with nationally recognized specialties in toxicology, epidemiology, risk assessment, product safety, contaminant fate and transport, and environmental chemistry. It assists national and global clients in resolving their complex problems relating to chemicals in the environment, in the workplace and in consumer products. Gradient’s principals and senior scientists are nationally recognized experts and active contributors to the promotion of sound science. For more information, go to www.gradientcorp.com .

New Website Launch for CCAR – Auto Safety, HazMat Testing & Information

Charlie Ayers, president of the Coordinating Committee for Automotive Repair (CCAR) announced the launch of a new website. CCAR currently serves hundreds of affiliates, thousand of users worldwide and sees millions of automotive safety and hazmat tests administered each year. In this past fiscal year alone, which ended in September, 2011 CCAR saw in excess of four million tests passed.

The new website at www.ccar- greenlink.org provides for a much needed face lift, a new platform allowing for ease of updating and the ability to provide greater access to information and product through blogs and other social channels.

The new site showcases the safe, clean and green philosophy that is CCAR. So green in fact, that the website itself is hosted on servers that are powered by wind. “It’s not just empty words about the environment for us here at CCAR,” says Ayers.

“Wind turbines generate the power to run our website and safety, cleanliness and care for our environment are at the core of our product offering. From automotive hazardous waste training to safety and pollution with our S/P2 training, to the actual awarding of “GreenLink Status” to collision and automotive repair shops around the country.”

CCAR Executive Director Daren Fristoe explains, “Automotive repair and collision shops can apply to earn ‘GreenLink’ shop status through CCAR and once approved, can display the designation to customers on counters, in windows and on their websites. This has been shown to increase traffic and sales from environmentally conscious potential customers,” he added. CCAR provides all the collateral material for display once a shop has earned the GreenLinkstatus.

Established in 1994, the Coordinating Committee for Automotive Repair is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization that works – internationally in scope – with the automotive industry, the insurance industry, OEM’s, career and technical schools, collision and automotive repair shops, governments, municipalities and other organizations to provide best practice information and training, and to measure improvements related to:

  • Pollution Prevention (P2).
  • Safety for all who repair or maintain vehicles as a profession, as well as those who work in related businesses.
  • Reduction of lost workdays due to accidents or job-related health issues.
  • Decreases in costs and liability exposure.
  • Reduction in costs of training in these areas.

CCAR has earned an exclusive alliance with the following United States Government entities:

  • EPA: Since 1995, CCAR has operated “CCAR-GreenLink®,” the National Environmental Compliance Assistance Center for Automotive Repair, in cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This free, web-based service provides a wide range of compliance and best practices information specifically for the auto repair industry.
  • OSHA: CCAR’s “Alliance” agreement with the US Department of Labor (DOL), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), works to develop best practices for those who work on or around vehicles to help protect employees’ health and safety. The agreement was first sign in 2004 and has been renewed every two years since.
  • DOT: At the request of the North American Automotive Hazmat Action Committee, a group of regulatory compliance specialists representing the major automotive manufacturers in North America, CCAR helped develop “HazmatU” an e-learning program for automotive dealers to address U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) training requirements for the shipment of hazardous materials.

In addition, CCAR provides the “S/P2” e-learning program in Safety and Pollution Prevention for the auto repair industry. HazmatU information is available at www.hazmatU.org – To learn more about CCAR, visit www.ccar- greenlink.org.

Compliance Reminder – New EPA Rule to Impact Auto Body & Auto Painting Shops in 2011 – Are You in Compliance?

Final Rule Information:http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t3/fr_notices/psmc_fr121407.pdf

A new Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule, “40 CFR Part 63 Subpart HHHHHH, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Paint Stripping and Miscellaneous Surface Coating Operations at Area Sources,” applies to all body shops and to many other small shops that paint metal and/or plastic parts. It also includes separate requirements for businesses that use chemical paint strippers containing methylene chloride (MeCl).

The rule requires the specific use of specified equipment and management practices. Shops must also keep records of training and compliance activities, and must submit reports and notifications to the EPA or other designated agencies. Existing shops have up to three years (2011) to comply; new shops must comply upon start-up.

Shops that conduct the following practices and use the following equipment may already comply with many of the requirements:

  • Apply spray coatings in a booth, prep station or mobile enclosure; all with exhaust filters that capture at least 98 percent of the paint overspray;
  • Use HVLP spray guns (or other application equipment with high transfer efficiencies);
  • Use enclosed gun washers (or other methods that reduce emissions of cleaning solvent).

Shop owners must certify that their painters have received hands-on and classroom training. Training and certifications are valid for up to five years. Required topics include:

Although the EPA intends this rule to cover all body shops, there’s no provision for shops to petition the agency for exemption. The petition must include a description of coatings sprayed and a certification that these coatings do not contain “target HAPs” or compounds of cadmium, chromium, lead, manganese and nickel.

Akzo Nobel worked closely with the EPA to develop a checklist for best practices (click HERE).

To see the EPA’s Fact Sheet on the rule, click HERE.

For updates on the rule and other topics of interest to body shops, check out the “What’s New” link at www.ccar-greenlink.org.

Click the Share Media below to place this on your site.

GasBadge Plus Recall By Industrial Scientific

Industrial Scientific Corporation has determined that the GasBadge Plus single gas instrument may not properly indicate a low battery condition resulting in a failure to alarm or instrument shut down. As a result, for safety reasons, Industrial Scientific is issuing a recall of all current GasBadge Plus instruments (v2.2 and earlier; manufactured prior to February 2012).

The following part numbers are covered by this recall:

INSTRUMENTS PART NUMBERS
GasBadge® Plus – Carbon Monoxide 18100050-1, 18100050-1xx, IPLU501
GasBadge® Plus – Hydrogen Sulfide 18100050-2, 18100050-2xx, IPLU502
GasBadge® Plus – Oxygen 18100050-3, 18100050-3xx, IPLU503
GasBadge® Plus – Nitrogen Dioxide 18100050-4, 18100050-4xx, IPLU504
GasBadge® Plus – Sulfur Dioxide 18100050-5, 18100050-5xx, IPLU505
xx = optional alphanumeric designation

Recall Notice PDF

Recall Notice – English
Recall Notice – French
Recall Notice – German
Recall Notice – Spanish
Recall Notice – Portuguese

Recall Return Forms

Customer GasBadge Plus Recall Form – Web
Customer GasBadge Plus Recall Form – PDF – English
Customer GasBadge Plus Recall Form – PDF – French
Customer GasBadge Plus Recall Form – PDF – German
Customer GasBadge Plus Recall Form – PDF – Spanish
Customer GasBadge Plus Recall Form – PDF – Portuguese

Distributor GasBadge Plus Recall Form – Web
Distributor GasBadge Plus Recall Form – PDF – English
Distributor GasBadge Plus Recall Form – PDF – French
Distributor GasBadge Plus Recall Form – PDF – German
Distributor GasBadge Plus Recall Form – PDF – Spanish
Distributor GasBadge Plus Recall Form – PDF – Portuguese

Customer FAQs PDF

Customer FAQs – English
Customer FAQs – French
Customer FAQs – Spanish
Customer FAQs – Portuguese

Formaldehyde Risks in Depth – Concerns Rise Over Workplace Exposure

Source: AP

Beauty salons and mortuaries in recent years have received numerous OSHA citations for violating federal exposure standards for formaldehyde. Several hair-straightening products contain the carcinogenic chemical.

Although beauty salons and mortuaries have drawn the most citations and fines for violating the federal exposure standard for formaldehyde among smaller companies, employer awareness of the hazards of this carcinogenic chemical and the details of complying with the standard vary widely in these two predominantly middle-market industries.

Because funeral directors and embalmers have a long history of working with formaldehyde, which chemical experts say is indispensable for preparing the human body for viewing, the National Funeral Directors Assn. has developed a best practice protocol for working with formaldehyde.

By contrast, beauty salon owners and stylists generally lack a scientific background and don’t have a keen awareness of the danger of working with products that contain formaldehyde, experts say. This is complicated by the fact that manufacturers of several popular hair-straightening products containing formaldehyde have mislabeled the products and not disclosed their formaldehyde content, according to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

Another problem is that, for the lay person, there are many unrecognizable names for formaldehyde, including methylene glycol, formalin and oxomethane, according to OSHA.

From October 2010 through September 2011 among companies with up to 99 employees, beauty salons racked up 62 citations for violating OSHA’s formaldehyde standard; funeral homes and crematories drew 16 citations.

An OSHA hazard alert said the agency is investigating “complaints from stylists and hair salon owners about exposure to formaldehyde while using hair-smoothing products such as Brazilian Blowout, Brasil Cacau Cadiveau, Keratin Complex Smoothing Therapy and Marcia Teixeira….Some of these products were labeled formaldehyde-free.”

“OSHA has conducted air sampling at multiple salons and found formaldehyde in the air when stylists were using hair smoothing products,” according to the hazard alert.

In a December 2010 advisory, Health Canada said it found up to 7% formaldehyde content in some hair-straightening products.

In September 2011, OSHA said it cited two manufacturers and distributors of hair-straightening products, including Keratin Complex Smoothing Therapy and Marcia Teixeira, “for failing to ensure that material safety data sheets reflected the content of formaldehyde in the product or the hazards associated with formaldehyde exposure, as well as for failing to develop a written hazard communication program for their own employees.”

The Professional Beauty Assn., a trade group representing beauty salons, “strives to inform and educate the professional beauty industry on a variety of topics and issues,” Myra Irizarry, government affairs director in Scottsdale, Ariz., said in an email.

The PBA posted “What You Don’t Know Can Hurt You: A Message from OSHA” on its website, stating that OSHA “has found that some hair-smoothing products may contain formaldehyde, may release formaldehyde at levels above OSHA’s permissible exposure limits during use and may be mislabeled, all of which can pose health risks to salon workers.”

The PBA website also contains detailed information about OSHA and other health agency findings of formaldehyde in keratin-based hair products. It urged salon workers to follow OSHA’s formaldehyde standard, to stay informed and take appropriate precautions as the “controversy” continues to be studied.

Salon owners across the country surveyed by the Washington-based nonprofit Environmental Working Group last spring were either unaware of the formaldehyde content in Keratin Complex Smoothing Therapy and similar products, minimized the danger of exposure or considered the issue “controversial.”

The distributor of Brazilian Blowout posted a disclaimer on its website stating that “while the media continues to report that Brazilian Blowout contains 8% to 10% formaldehyde, it is important to understand that this relates to the measure of potential formaldehyde released at a level that never occurs in a real-world application.

“As federal OSHA is aware, the only accurate method of testing free formaldehyde exposure is via controlled air monitoring. Every controlled air monitoring test conducted by OSHA and alternate reputable institutions has produced results conveying that the Brazilian Blowout Smoothing Treatment falls well beneath even the most stringent of OSHA safety standards,” according to the distributor, Brazilian Blowout, North Hollywood, Calif.

“This information is now being communicated to the FDA, demonstrating that the Brazilian Blowout complies with all air monitoring guidelines.

“You can continue to confidently offer the Brazilian Blowout to your customers with the knowledge that the Brazilian Blowout falls well below the safety standards set by OSHA,” the distributor said.

Jeremy Lurie, marketing specialist at M&M International in Delray Beach, Fla., which distributes Marcia Teixeira keratin treatments, said the treatments do not contain formaldehyde. “I’ve never been one to shy away from truth in advertising,” he said, noting that the company’s website says that their original treatments contain methylene glycol, which produces a trace amount of formaldehyde gas when heated, and are “substantially below OSHA standards for safe exposure.”

“What caused the controversy is misrepresentation by other companies that their products are formaldehyde-free,” Mr. Lurie said. “Our newest products, Soft and Soft Chocolate, do not contain any ingredients that produce formaldehyde.”

On the Keratin Complex website, Larry Solomon, president, wrote: “We disagree with OSHA’s inflammatory and inaccurate report and we are asking for a full retraction. Keratin Complex not only complies with all OSHA standards, but we meet or exceed their safety standards and requirements.”

“Some salons have taken appropriate precautions by discontinuing the use of these products. However, as of the spring when we published our report, over 60% of top salons nationwide were still using keratin-straightening products,” said a spokeswoman for the Washington-based Environmental Working Group, which has urged the FDA to take these products off the market.

A small salon owner, who wished to remain unidentified, said that one distributor cited by OSHA “swore up and down there was no formaldehyde” in its keratin products. He continued: “We stopped using most of (them). We found that most of those companies haven’t been honest with us. A couple of clients want them and we have them sign a release, saying we’re not sure what’s in the product.”

Hair Cuttery, a national chain, advertises on its website that it provides a “Keratin Smoothing System.” In response to a question about what precautions are taken to protect stylists against formaldehyde exposure when using keratin products, a spokeswoman for Hair Cuttery parent Ratner Cos. in Vienna, Va., said in an email that “We do not use straightening products that contain formaldehyde in our salons.”

When questioned about this discrepancy and whether the company had discontinued using Keratin Smoothing System, she said, “The system we use is Bionaza Premiere Brazilian Keratin Treatment and it is formaldehyde-free.”

Salons across the country continue to advertise keratin hair- smoothing services on their websites, including Joseph Michael’s Salon & Spa in Chicago.

“The main precaution we take is a large carbon filter system that’s portable and goes with the stylist,” said Allison Vannoy, general manager. “We let the stylist decide whether to do the services or not. All are welcome to wear a mask, but most don’t. We haven’t seen any adverse results and if we do, we’ll take a second look,” she said. “We look at the (OSHA) regulations on a pretty regular basis,” she said.

“If you follow best practices management, you can use (formaldehyde) safely,” said John Reed Sr., owner of Dodd & Reed Funeral Home in Webster Springs, West Va., and past president of the NFDA. “A good exhaust system” is a main precaution as well as “absolutely monitoring the air” and wearing gloves and masks when working with products containing formaldehyde, he said.

“The best precaution is to follow OSHA guidelines, and really the best way is proper ventilation. Keep that air changing in the room,” said Vernie Fountain, a licensed funeral director and owner of Fountain National Academy in Springfield, Mo., which teaches “difficult embalming cases and post-mortem reconstructive surgery.”

“I know from limited experience with salons that they don’t have a safety and health or hazard communication program that they review with employees,” said Jack Luckhardt, president of safety and health consultant The Luckhardt Group in Oviedo, Fla. “They need to check the labels of all the materials they have and make sure they have a material safety data sheet. They need to get the information and make it available to employees and watch out for warning signs,” such as itching or burning in the eyes, said Mr. Luckhardt, a former board member of the American Society of Safety Engineers.

“But one of the problems they’re up against is there are manufacturers of hair care products that were labeled as formaldehyde-free, when in fact the products when heated release formaldehyde,” he said.

“I think a lot of the salons are flying blind,” Mr. Luckhardt said.

Northern Steel Castings Cited by OSHA at Wisconsin Plant for Silica Dust Exposure

Posted by on November 28, 2011

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration has cited Northern Steel Castings for two safety and four health violations at its Wisconsin Rapids carbon steel foundry, including for overexposing workers to crystalline silica, a known respiratory hazard, according to a Nov. 28 press release.

Proposed fines total $95,480.

OSHA initiated the inspection after receiving a complaint alleging overexposure to crystalline silica, a basic component of soil, sand, granite and other minerals. When workers chip, cut, drill or grind objects that contain silica, small particles can be created and breathing in crystalline silica dust can cause silicosis, an incurable condition that reduces the ability of lungs to take in oxygen.

Northern Steel Castings also was cited for two repeat health violations for allowing workers to be overexposed to iron oxide and copper fumes in the foundry, and for exposing employees to fire hazards when welding inside plywood booths.

A repeat violation exists when an employer previously has been cited for the same or a similar violation of a standard, regulation, rule or order at any other facility in federal enforcement states within the last five years. The company was cited for these violations in 2006.

Additionally, three serious health violations were cited for failing to keep eating surfaces free from contamination by hexavalent chromium; failing to provide ventilation when welding, and for failing to provide adequate emergency exits.

A serious violation occurs when there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or should have known.

Northern Steel Castings had been inspected by OSHA 24 times prior to this inspection and was cited for overexposure to silica six other times. The company has 15 business days from receipt of its citations and penalties to comply, request an informal conference with OSHA’s area director or contest the findings before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.