OSHA QuickTakes – May 16, 2012

 

In this issue

OSHA kicks off summer campaign to prevent heat-related illnesses and fatalities among outdoor workers: Educational materials and mobile application available

Heat Illness Prevention Campaign ad

OSHA has kicked off a national outreach initiative to educate workers and their employers about the hazards of working outdoors in the heat and steps needed to prevent heat-related illnesses. OSHA’s 2012 Heat Illness Prevention Campaign builds on last year’s successful summer campaign as well as CAL/OSHA’s successful initiative in 2010. Nationwide last summer, OSHA participated in 500 national and local conferences, training sessions, and media events, and distributed more than 180,000 heat hazard materials in English and Spanish.

For outdoor workers, ‘water, rest and shade’ are three words that can make the difference between life and death,” Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis said. “If employers take reasonable precautions, and look out for their workers, we can beat the heat.”

The OSHA heat app
The OSHA heat app.

Each year, thousands of outdoor workers experience serious illnesses such as heat exhaustion. For 2010, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that 4,190 workers suffered from heat illness and 40 died from heat stroke and related causes on the job. Although outdoor workers in a variety of industries are susceptible to heat illness, those in construction and agriculture are the most vulnerable.

For information and resources on heat illness, visit OSHA’s Heat Illness Prevention page. To order quantities of OSHA’s heat illness educational materials in English or Spanish, call OSHA’s Office of Communications at (202) 693-1999 or email Meilinger.Francis2@dol.gov. More details are also available in the press release (y en Español).

OSHA’s Fall Prevention Campaign: New OSHA and stakeholder educational materials on fatal falls

NORA fatality map
OSHA stakeholder NORA maps fatal falls for CY 2011

As part of OSHA’s Fall Prevention Campaign to prevent deadly falls in the construction industry, OSHA is working closely with NIOSH, the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA) program and scores of stakeholders to get resources out to employers and workers – especially vulnerable workers with limited English proficiency.

To raise awareness of the hazards of the construction industry, the NORA program has developed interactive maps which illustrate construction workers killed on the job, including in fatal falls. If you are aware of a construction worksite fatality that has occurred since January 2012, you can email NORA at fatalitymap@cpwr.com with the date, location, cause of the fatality, and your contact information.

Fatal falls among Massachusetts construction workers
Fatal falls among construction workers in Massachusetts over the last five years.

In addition, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health is working to inform construction employers, workers and other stakeholders about numbers and causes of fatal falls in the state (PDF*). In Massachusetts over the last five years, 44 construction workers fell to their deaths.

Across the U.S. in 2010, more than 10,000 construction workers were injured as a result of falling while working from heights, and another 255 workers were killed. For more information, visit OSHA’s new Fall Prevention page.

OSHA also has new educational materials available. A new poster and factsheet—offered in both English and Spanish—provide employers and workers with life-saving information about working safely from ladders, scaffolds and roofs. To get copies of OSHA’s new Fall Prevention poster or fact sheet in English or in Spanish, please call 202-693-1999 or visit OSHA’s Publications page to order online.

 

Fall Prevention poster
Fall Prevention Poster
English: HTML | PDF* — en Español: HTML | PDF*
Fall Prevention Fact Sheet
Fall Prevention Fact Sheet
English: HTML | PDF* — en Español: HTML | PDF*

NIOSH researchers find respirable crystalline silica hazard for workers engaged in hydraulic fracturing operations

On April 30, NIOSH researchers presented preliminary data (PDF*) which suggest that gas and oil workers may be exposed to dangerously high levels of respirable crystalline silica while performing hydraulic fracturing operations. The researchers found that nearly half (47%) of the workers sampled were exposed to levels of silica above OSHA’s permissible exposure limits with almost 80% of those sampled exposed above NIOSH’s recommended exposure limits.

The findings were reported by Eric Esswein during a meeting of the Institute of Medicine on The Health Impact Assessment of New Energy Sources: Shale Gas Extraction. The researchers identified seven primary dust generation points, which include refilling/hot loading and release from top hatches, T-belt operations, and the “dragon’s tail.” Esswein also discussed possible means of prevention through design.

Inhalation of respirable crystalline silica particles has long been known to cause silicosis, a disabling and sometimes fatal lung disease. For more information, visit OSHA’s Safety and Health Topics page on Crystalline Silica.

Assistant Secretary speaks on OSHA outreach at Kentucky Governor’s Safety and Health Conference

On May 9, Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA Dr. David Michaels addressed participants at the 28th Annual Governor’s Safety and Health Conference and Exposition in Louisville, Kentucky. Dr. Michaels spoke about OSHA’s Workers’ Memorial Day events in honor of fallen workers, and discussed recent OSHA initiatives to protect workers from hazardous chemicals, falls in construction, and heat illness. He also invited those in attendance to join OSHA in making the Fall Prevention in Construction and Heat Illness Prevention campaigns a success.

The Governor’s Safety and Health Conference features courses, keynote speakers, and concurrent workshops focused on state-of-the-art techniques, current issues, and trends in workplace safety and health. For more information, visit the Kentucky Conference Web site.

OSHA posts new application materials to bring transparency to the variance approval process

To make the process of applying for a variance more transparent and straightforward, OSHA has posted new application forms and checklists to its Variances page. A variance is a regulatory action that permits an employer to deviate from the requirements of an OSHA standard under specified conditions. OSHA may grant a variance to employers who can prove their alternative method, condition, practice, operation, or process provides workers as safe or healthful a workplace as the applicable OSHA standard requires.

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, OSHA has worked with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to create these new materials, which significantly reduce the burden of preparing a complete and appropriate application. For more information and to access the new materials, visit OSHA’s page on How to apply for a variance.

DeMoulas Super Markets agrees to correct hazards, enhance employee safety at all Market Basket stores in Massachusetts and New Hampshire

The Department of Labor has reached a settlement with DeMoulas Super Markets Inc. in which the Tewksbury grocery chain has agreed to correct all hazards and take substantive steps to enhance safety and health measures for employees at all of the chain’s more than 60 Market Basket stores in Massachusetts and New Hampshire.

“This enterprisewide settlement is significant because DeMoulas has agreed not only to correct the hazards cited during OSHA’s inspections but also to enact effective and ongoing systemic changes that will benefit all its employees,” said Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Dr. David Michaels.

These changes will include a full-time safety and health director, written safety and health programs, and formal safety and health training for all workers, in addition to a number of other improvements. The company has also paid $400,000 in fines. The settlement resolves litigation that followed citations carrying $589,200 in OSHA fines in October 2011 after OSHA’s inspections identified widespread fall and laceration hazards at the stores. For more information see the press release.

OSHA orders Tennessee trucking company to reinstate whistleblower, pay more than $180,000 in back wages and damages

OSHA has ordered Brush Creek-based Mark Alvis Inc., a commercial motor carrier, to reinstate a former employee and pay him more than $180,000 in back pay, interest, and compensatory and punitive damages.

The order follows OSHA’s determination that the company violated the worker’s rights under the whistleblower provisions of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act by terminating him for his refusal to drive while fatigued and ill or violate the hours-of-service requirements outlined in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations. The order issued by OSHA also requires the trucking company to expunge any adverse references relating to the discharge from the complainant’s personnel records, and to post a notice for employees and provide a fact sheet to them with notification of their rights under the STAA. For more details, read the news release.

OSHA enforces the whistleblower provisions of the STAA and of Section 11(c) of the OSH Act, as well as 19 other whistleblower statutes. Detailed information on workers’ whistleblower rights is available on OSHA’s Whistleblower page.

OSHA issues willful citations to Wisconsin pump service, Rhode Island contractor, and Ohio excavation company for exposing workers to trenching hazards

OSHA has cited River Falls, Wisconsin-based Gordy’s Pump Service with five safety – including two willful – violations as the result of an inspection conducted after a 19-year-old worker died when an unprotected trench collapsed at a Spring Valley job site on Nov. 3, 2011. The teenager had just finished locating an existing waterline in the 220 feet long, 6 feet deep and 2 feet wide trench using a hand-held shovel when a sidewall caved in. Proposed fines total $137,000. Due to the willful violations, OSHA has placed Gordy’s Pump Service in its Severe Violator Enforcement Program, which focuses on recalcitrant employers and mandates targeted follow-up inspections to ensure compliance with the law. For further details, see the news release.

In Rhode Island, OSHA has proposed fines totaling $117,740 against Newport-based Raymond J. Cawley Contracting Inc. for allowing cave-in and other hazards while workers were excavating at 28 W. Main Road in Middletown to replace a sewer line. OSHA’s inspection found workers in an unsafe 8-foot-deep trench who were working without means of safe egress, protective helmets, or adequate training. For more information about the willful, repeat, and serious citations, see the news release.

OSHA has also cited Perrysburg, Ohio-based Stillion Brothers Excavation Inc. with five safety – including two willful – violations for failing to protect workers from trench cave-ins at a job site in Columbus Grove. OSHA initiated an inspection on Dec. 15, 2011, under the agency’s National Emphasis Program on Trenching and Excavation. Six workers were installing 20-foot-long steel plates into a 12-foot-deep trench using a hydraulic excavator with a swivel hook that was not equipped with a safety latch. Proposed penalties total $72,820. Read the news release for additional information.

Detailed information on trenching and excavation hazards and related OSHA standards is available on OSHA’s Trenching and Excavation page.

OSHA’s Free On-Site Consultation Program helps NC wood pallet manufacturer to protect workers

Edwards Wood Products
John Bogner (NC Project Mgr.), Jeff Edwards (CEO), Lynne Greene (Director Admin. Services), David Poole (Safety Consult.), Scott Hammond (Health Consult.) Howard Walters (Consult. Supervisor)

In an industry where workers are at risk for hazards from amputation to combustible dust, Edwards Wood Products, Inc. (EWPI) of Marshville, NC decided to reach out to the North Carolina Department of Labor (NCDOL), Consultative Services Bureau, for help in strengthening its safety and health management system.

J. Lynn Greene, EWPI’s Human Resources and Safety Director, first contacted OSHA for help in 1995. Since then, OSHA’s On-site Consultation Program, which offers free and confidential advice to small and medium-sized businesses, has helped Greene to implement engineering and administrative controls to eliminate and reduce hazards. Some of EWPI’s improvements have included redesigning the dust collection system around the pole mill and making changes to the facility’s vibrating conveyer system. Since becoming the first small business in the wood industry to achieve SHARP status in North Carolina in 2003, EWPI has worked to continually improve its safety and health management system.

On April 20, Greene reported that savings from lower injuries, incidences, and frequency rates have enabled the company to purchase new equipment, improve the workplace environment, and hire more workers. “We could not have put 35 new people to work if we did not have a strong safety and health management system helping the bottom line profit and loss statements,” he said. More information about the company is available on OSHA’s Small Business Success Stories page.

I have rights

OSHA poster on young workers’ safety and health rights now available for high schools and colleges

OSHA’s “I have rights” poster for young workers is available for order. The poster is directed at workers aged 16-24 to provide information and educational resources about rights to a safe and healthful workplace under the OSH Act.

To request copies, call 202-693-1999 or visit OSHA’s Publications page to order online. Additional information for young workers, employers, parents and educators, can be found on OSHA’s Young Worker page.

OSHA and the Laser Institute of America renew Alliance to protect workers from laser hazards

On May 9, OSHA renewed its Alliance with the Laser Institute of America (LIA) to reduce and prevent worker exposure to laser beam and non-beam hazards in industrial, research and medical workplaces. The Alliance will also share information on laser regulations and standards, effects lasers have on the eyes and skin, laser control measures and laser safety program administration.

“Worker exposure to laser beams can result in eye and skin damage, and in more serious cases, blindness and skin cancer,” said Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health David Michaels. “This renewed Alliance will help broaden outreach efforts to workers and employers and share critical education and information to reduce preventable injuries.”

For more information about the OSHA-LIA Alliance, see the news release. To learn more about laser hazards and laser safety, visit OSHA’s Safety and Health Topics pages on Laser Hazards, Laser/Electrosurgery Plume, and Radiation.

Updated Workers’ Memorial Day page covers events held to honor fallen workers around the country

OSHA has updated its Workers’ Memorial Day page to include photographs and descriptions of memorial events from across the United States. In honor of Workers’ Memorial Day (April 28) OSHA’s National, Regional, and Area Offices co-sponsored and attended events to honor those workers who have died on the job, to acknowledge the grievous suffering experienced by families and communities, and to recommit ourselves to the fight for safe and healthful workplaces for all workers.

Workers' Memorial Day Web spage

OSHA welcomes Alliance members and families to kick off 2012 NAOSH Week

ASSE Safety on the Job poster contest winner
Eleven-year-old Abigail Helser of Madison, Ala., was one of the 2012 winners of the ASSE Safety on the Job poster contest.

On May 7, Assistant Secretary Dr. David Michaels, along with Terrie Norris, President of the American Society of Safety Engineers and Jim Hopkins, Secretary of the Canadian Society of Safety Engineering marked the start of this year’s North American Occupational Safety and Health (NAOSH) Week.

The Assistant Secretary highlighted OSHA’s initiatives to prevent falls and heat injuries and the agency’s recent release of the hazard communication standard. This year’s NAOSH week theme, “Safety, What Every Business Needs,” was highlighted by the winners of ASSE’s 10th Annual “Safety-on-the-Job” poster contest in which children create illustrated posters with safety messages to their parents and other workers. Contest winners and runners up can be viewed here.

“These posters are vivid representations of an ideal work environment in the eyes of the next generation of workers.” said Dr. Michaels. Visit the NAOSH Week Web site for more information, or contact Morgan Seuberling at seuberling.morgan@dol.gov.

Job openings

Are you interested in a career with the Department of Labor? DOL has job opportunities throughout the country, including openings in OSHA.

2012 Death on the Job Report

Since Congress passed the Occupational Safety and Health Act in 1970, workplace safety and health conditions have improved. But too many workers remain at serious risk of injury, illness or death.

In 2010, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 4,690 workers were killed on the job—an average of 13 workers every day—and an estimated 50,000 died from occupational diseases. Workers suffer an additional 7.6 million to 11.4 million job injuries and illnesses each year. The cost of job injuries and illnesses is enormous—estimated at $250 billion to $300 billion a year.

The risk of job fatalities and injuries varies widely from state to state—from 13.1 fatalities per 100,000 workers in West Virginia to 0.9 fatalities per 100,000 in New Hampshire. Latino workers continue to be at increased risk of job fatalities, with a fatality rate of 3.9 per 100,000 workers in 2010.

This year’s edition of “Death on the Job” details not only the data about workplace death, injuries and illnesses, but also the reasons behind them and what must be done to save lives.

Download the full 2012 “Death on the Job” report.

Download sections of the 2012 “Death on the Job” report:

University of California Study: US Workplace Injuries and Illness Costs Are Higher Than Expected

In the first comprehensive review of its kind since 1992, a University of California Davis researcher has estimated the national annual price tag of occupational injuries and illnesses at $250 billion.

That figure is $31 billion more than the direct and indirect costs of all cancers, $76 billion more than diabetes and $187 more than strokes.

The study strongly suggests that the United States should place greater emphasis on reducing work-related injuries and illnesses, especially since costs have risen by more than $33 billion (inflation adjusted) since the 1992 analysis.

“It’s unfortunate that occupational health doesn’t get the attention it deserves,” says J. Paul Leigh, professor of public health sciences at UC Davis and author of the study. “The costs are enormous and continue to grow. And the potential for health risks are high, given that most people between the ages of 22 to 65 spend 40 percent of their waking hours at work.”

Where Did the Data Come From?

In generating the estimate, Leigh gathered 2007 data on occupational injuries and illnesses and their costs for civilian workers, including agricultural and self-employed workers. Injury and disease data came from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Available epidemiological research on the percentages of diseases—such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cancer—that can be attributed to occupational exposures was also considered. Leigh accounted for unreported injury and illness using estimates from BLS and state workers’ compensation systems.

Cost data came from the National Council on Compensation Insurance, the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, and the National Academy of Social Insurance. Total costs were calculated by multiplying the number of cases of occupational injury or illness by the average cost per case.

The study estimated that there were:

  • 8,564,600 fatal and nonfatal work-related injuries, which cost $192 billion
  • 516,100 fatal and nonfatal work-related illnesses, which cost $58 billion

The study also estimated 59,102 combined deaths from occupational injuries and diseases, which was higher than all deaths from motor vehicle crashes (43,945), breast cancer (40,970), or prostate cancer (29,093) in the same year.

Leigh noted in the study that workers’ compensation premiums do not currently account for these high figures. In fact, less than 25 percent of the costs of workplace injuries and illnesses are covered by workers’ comp. As a result, many occupational health issues go unresolved, and the bulk of the costs are absorbed by employer-provided medical insurance, Medicare, and Medicaid, raising healthcare costs for everyone.

Leigh believes that if workers’ comp premiums were based on costs for each employer rather than on industry wide costs, organizations would be much more motivated to invest in prevention campaigns and eliminate hazards because they would see the benefits of those changes to the bottom line.

Safety Photo of the Day! – April 3, 2012

What’s wrong with this picture?  Would you weld like this??

More than 365,000 individuals sustain welding-related eye injuries annually. The welding industry is rated number one among all industries for the highest number of eye injuries. Based on a Prevent Blindness America report (www.preventblindness.org), eye injuries accounted for approximately 15 percent of total injuries and accounted for more than three times the number reported in the construction industry. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, more than 365,000 individuals become victims of eye injuries that are related to welding activities, at an estimated cost to employers of more than $467 million annually.

This article will address recommended personal protective equipment, OSHA guidelines, and ANSI standards for protective eyewear and apparel for the welding industry. After a quick review of the most common types of welding and welding-related activities, we will examine protective eyewear and apparel for the industry.

Welding is uniting two or more pieces of metal by using heat or, sometimes, pressure. Types of welding:

  • Gas welding uses a combination of electric arc and gas to fuse metal surfaces together. For example, MIG (Metal Inert Gas) or TIG (Tungsten Inert Gas) welding is common for more detailed work. Both use an inert gas such as argon or carbon dioxide, along with a consumable metal rod or wire to complete the weld.
  • Arc welding uses an electric arc to heat, melt, and mix molten deposits of the coated electrode to create the metal bond.

Other possible injury sources related to welding are encountered in oxygen and arc cutting, which are sometimes used to sever or remove metal in welding. Additionally, torch soldering and brazing are related activities required of welders.

All PPE assessments should begin with a hazard evaluation. The Occupational Safety & Health Administration supports that the first hazard assessment procedure be given to engineering controls to remove or reduce sources of any possible injuries. After this assessment is completed, remaining potential hazards and sources of injuries will need to be identified.

Many PPE manufacturers can be a source for surveys with specific questions to help in obtaining the necessary information for making the most appropriate recommendations for eye, hand, and body requirements.

Eyewear
Let’s first examine protective eyewear considerations for welding. Perhaps the high number of welding-related eye injuries can be contributed to welding requirements that involve exposure to hot metal (molten) slag, vapors, fumes, flying particles, and infrared and ultraviolet radiation. ANSI defines optical radiation to include both UV and IR rays, which vary on the light spectrum in regard to their level of intensity (nanometer, nm). The opportunity for injuries is increased when welding at above “eye level” distances.

Welding environments require a combination of protective eyewear or goggles to be worn in combination with helmets to provide adequate protection. Torch soldering, brazing, and cutting activities may require only protective eyewear or goggles. Maximum orbital seal is essential to protect the eyes from harmful optical radiation. Dielectric (no metal parts) frames are necessary for welders near electrical systems to avoid possible arc flash burns.

Because UV and IR rays are not visible, exposure can go undetected. Overexposure to harmful optical radiation occurs within seconds of looking directly at a welding arc without eye protection. Welder’s flash and “arc eye” are common industry names for the condition medically named Photokeratitis.

As a general rule, select filter shades or lenses beginning with a shade too dark to see the welding zone. Then evaluate a lighter shade that provides adequate vision without going below the minimum protective shade. Most protective eyewear manufacturers offer 2.0, 3.0, and 5.0 filter shades, which protect against harmful optical radiation generated when working with molten metal, cutting, soldering, and brazing. A filter shade 2.0 lens allows 29-43 percent of light to be transmitted, filter shade 3.0 lenses allow 8.5-18 percent of light to be transmitted, and filter shade 5.0 lenses allow 1.8-3.6 percent of light to be transmitted. These shades are available in protective eyewear, goggles, and welding helmets.

Remember that welding helmets are secondary protectors, so they should not be used without protective eyewear or goggles being worn underneath. Care needs to be given to the selection process to achieve the most comfortable fit and best orbital seal.

OSHA’s 29 CFR 1910.252 lists minimum shade requirements for a variety of welding operations. Additionally, ANSI Z87.1-2003 addresses safety recommendations for protective eyewear.

Here is a general guide for filter shade recommendations:

Torch soldering Shade 2
Torch brazing Shade 3
Light cutting up to 1″ Shade 3
Medium cutting up to 6″ Shade 5
Heavy cutting more than 6″ Shade 5
Gas welding, light up to 1/8″ Shade 5
Gas welding, medium 1/8″ to 1/2″ Shade 5
Arc welding Shade 8-12

NFPA Launches a New Effort to Spread the Word on Safe Work Practices for Confined Spaces

NFPA Journal®, March/April 2012

By Guy Colonna

Every year, nearly 100 people across the country die in what are known as “confined spaces.” These are areas that can be dangerous because they possess limited means for entry and exit, have unfavorable natural ventilation that can contribute to the creation and buildup of atmospheric hazards, and are not intended for continuous human occupancy. Confined spaces span a wide range of industries and uses, including storage tanks, process vessels, hoppers, bins, silos, sewers, boilers, utility vaults, pipelines and pipe tunnels, and cargo spaces and holds on marine vessels. Steel mills, paper mills, chemical plants, refineries, public utilities, construction sites, recycling facilities, grain silos — they all contain confined spaces.

Such spaces are considered dangerous by design because they generally have limited or restricted openings for accessing and exiting, and they often contain products that can introduce atmospheric hazards. The hazards are more fully described in terms of atmospheric hazards, which include oxygen content, flammable gases or vapors, and toxic substances, and physical or mechanical hazards. These physical hazards can include engulfment, which can occur in grain storage bins or silos; entrapment, where the space design promotes an entrant becoming trapped due to narrow space configurations; and other examples such as slippery surfaces, noise, thermal stresses, or energized electrical or mechanical devices.

NFPA has many years’ experience addressing confined space situations and identifying effective solutions that ensure safe entry and work within confined and enclosed spaces in a variety of industry settings. With this track record in mind, NFPA’s Standards Council recently approved the formation of a new committee project to more directly address the ongoing problem of fire and life safety issues in confined spaces. According to the project’s scope, the Committee on Confined Space Safe Work Practices will have “primary responsibility for documents on safeguarding against fire, explosion, and health hazards associated with entry and work in confined and enclosed spaces. The committee shall also have primary responsibility for developing safe work practices based upon hazard recognition, evaluation, and control for those occupancies with confined or enclosed spaces. The safe work practices shall also address exit procedures from the spaces.”

The new committee’s work will focus on safe work practices, rather than necessarily establishing additional requirements, and will include translating existing regulatory language into practical approaches that can be understood and implemented at all levels of the affected workplaces. The committee will also look at responder safety issues related to confined spaces.

Addressing gaps
An important task of the new committee will involve addressing gaps in coverage that have become apparent since the completion of a federal confined space regulation nearly 20 years ago.

In 1993, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issued its long-awaited regulation addressing entry and work in confined spaces: “Permit-Required Confined Spaces (PRCS),” 29 CFR 1910.146. The regulation established a more concise definition for what constitutes a confined space: it must be large enough to permit entry to do work; it is recognized as not being intended for continuous human occupancy; and it has limited or restricted means of entry or exit. In addition, the agency used the presence of the hazards to determine what level of controls to implement. Permit-required and non-permit-required confined spaces were defined in terms of the presence of either the atmospheric hazards or physical mechanical hazards.

The PRCS was long-awaited because, leading up to it, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) had been citing lack of workplace safety standards as a contributing factor in the significant number of confined-space-related fatalities, observations that were collected in the 1994 report “Worker Deaths in Confined Spaces: A Summary of NIOSH Surveillance and Investigative Findings.” The NIOSH publication examined several key issues that OSHA had used to guide the development of its final regulation. First, atmospheric hazards contributed significantly to the fatality statistics from the mid-1970s to the late 1980s, which were generally dominated by oxygen deficiency. Second, regardless if the cause of the fatal incidents were attributed to atmospheric or physical/mechanical hazards, attempted rescue also increased the number of workers who lost their lives in confined spaces. OSHA estimated that for the 1979–1981 period, confined spaces were the cause of 174 fatalities per year.

The confined space problem has improved in the nearly two decades since OSHA’s PRCS was issued — but only to a point. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries provides a source for data on confined space fatalities resulting from both atmospheric and physical hazards. BLS analysis of its data for the five-year period from 1997–2001 indicated that the average number of fatalities was 92 per year. A similar review of the most recent five-year period that BLS data are available, from 2005–2009, shows the rate for fatal incidents to be virtually unchanged — about 92 per year, or the equivalent of an incident every four days.

One relevant change in the data, however, is that 20 years ago the focus was on atmospheric hazards, as they often represented as much as two-thirds of the reported incidents, according to NIOSH. The most recent data suggest that the relationship has flipped: physical hazards accounted for approximately 60 percent of the reported incidents, while atmospheric hazards accounted for about 33 percent. It’s not yet clear what factors have contributed to this shift, but it’s possible that the increased incidents involving entrapments at grain storage facilities (see “A Threat with Many Faces.”) are responsible for at least some of it.

NFPA’s work in the area of confined spaces is represented by its long history guiding the safe entry and work practices for the maritime sector. NFPA’s involvement can be traced to the 1920s and involves maritime construction and repair — typically hot work. Since 1922, NFPA has developed and published NFPA 306, Control of Gas Hazards on Vessels, which defines the safety conditions that must be met in order for workers to enter the various maritime vessel confined spaces and to perform hot work associated with construction, repair, or scrapping (also referred to as shipbreaking). Because of the flammable and combustible liquids and gaseous cargoes and fuels carried aboard these vessels, any hot work activity planned for the tanks, piping, or adjacent spaces must be prepared according to the NFPA standard, which has been adopted by OSHA and U.S. Coast Guard regulations.

In the mid-1980s, NFPA codes and standards expanded to address a land-based application involving confined spaces and hot work when it developed a new standard to address activities associated with the removal of underground petroleum storage tanks identified as leaking through inspections conducted in response to an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) initiative. NFPA 326, Safeguarding of Tanks and Containers for Entry, Cleaning, or Repair, used a model followed within the maritime segment that stresses a three-step approach to safety when preparing to enter and work in confined spaces: hazard recognition, hazard evaluation, and hazard control.

An important aspect of the maritime standard is the presence of a specifically identified and designated individual, the Marine Chemist, who is certificated and charged with implementing the three-step hazard program for all maritime spaces. The Marine Chemist is required by OSHA and Coast Guard regulations to evaluate the hazards associated with entry and work in maritime confined spaces before such work can proceed. The Marine Chemist, certificated through an industry supported and established program managed by NFPA staff, documents compliance with federal regulations and NFPA 306 and issues a permit stating the conditions found and the entry and work limitations that apply to each inspection. No such uniquely qualified individual exists within other industrial sectors to implement the regulations of OSHA or other safe work practices involving confined spaces.

NFPA also developed and maintains confined space technical rescue provisions that complement OSHA’s PRCS requirements. These provisions are found in NFPA 1670, Operations and Training for Technical Search and Rescue Incidents, and NFPA 1006, Technical Rescuer Professional Qualifications. A significant element of OSHA’s regulation was the requirement for employers to provide a confined space rescue capability for all entries meeting the “permit required” classification. Employers are permitted to satisfy this requirement either by providing an on-site rescue capability or by relying on off-site services, which generally means the local fire department. In the months following OSHA’s issuance of the PRCS, there were a number of instances involving rescue attempts by ill-prepared local fire departments that resulted in loss of firefighter lives. Guidance in the form of NFPA 1670 and the companion professional qualifications document, NFPA 1006, have subsequently addressed much of the early training needs for those involved with emergency response to confined space workplaces.

Even so, as recently as 2010, firefighter lives continued to be lost or threatened while responding to these emergencies. In June of that year, following two separate confined-space incidents that killed the initial civilian victims and critically injured several firefighters, major firefighting organizations, including the International Association of Fire Chiefs, called for fire chiefs and officers to issue stand down orders in their departments, meaning that personnel would postpone any non-emergency tasks to focus on confined-space safety training.

Just weeks after the stand down call, however, a volunteer firefighter in New York State died while attempting to rescue a utility worker who had entered a manhole to investigate a reported sewer problem; the medical examiner reported that the cause of death for both men was asphyxia due to low oxygen and exposure to sewer gases. A NIOSH report on the incident listed contributing factors in the firefighter’s death as unrecognized hazards involved with a confined space; lack of standard operating procedures for confined space technical rescue operations; and an ineffective incident management system for a confined space technical rescue operation. The agency’s key recommendations included ensuring that firefighters are properly trained and equipped to recognize the hazards of, and participate in, a confined space technical rescue operation; that standard operating procedures regarding technical rescue capabilities are in place and a risk benefit analysis is performed to protect the safety of all responders; that an effective incident management system is in place that supports technical rescue confined space operations; and that a safety officer properly trained in the technical rescue field being performed is on scene and integrated into the command structure.

Safety in any workplace
While the OSHA PRCS standard provides the basic requirements for hazard identification and classification and hazard evaluation, NFPA recognizes that more can be done to address confined space issues. With a few exceptions — such as specifications requiring a permit system, and for emergency services and confined space rescue — the PRCS does not effectively incorporate other control measures such as isolation, substitution, ventilation, and personal protective equipment into safe work practices. In fact, the requirements seem to emphasize the rescue provisions over those associated with prevention of the need for an emergency rescue.

Recognizing that the minimum requirements of the federal standard still fall short when interpreted and applied at workplaces throughout many industries, NFPA’s new project will focus on developing safe work practices suitable for a variety of workplaces. The committee will soon begin work on developing a document and, considering the nature of the safe work practices, it is likely that the document would be best suited as a guide or recommended practice. In addition to considering factors related to entry, work, and exit, the final document could include information applicable to the individual who performs the testing of the atmosphere in these spaces. NFPA 306 and the maritime program have been in place for 90 years and represent one extreme: the program requires and relies on the testing to be conducted by a certificated professional, practicing to a state-of-the-art industry standard of best practices. Nothing similar exists anywhere else in industry, but as a guide or recommended practice, the attributes of a Marine Chemist-like person could be presented for use as the model since so much depends upon effective atmospheric monitoring in these spaces.

This important new project offers an opportunity to interpret the requirements found in the OSHA regulation and other standards and to guide the implementation — in other words, to turn “What do I have to do?” into “Here’s how I can do it.” The regular occurrence of confined space incidents demonstrates the need for continued vigilance toward this workplace hazard, one that demands consistent attention to recognize, evaluate, and control so that workers can be assured of safe entry, work, and exit from all spaces.

 

OSHA Database Underreports Workplace Fatalities

 

Federal officials have admitted that OSHA’s database for tracking workplace fatalities is deficient in several key respects.

January 01, 2012 /24-7PressRelease/ — The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is the division of the U.S. Department of Labor charged with protecting the safety of employees in the workplace. OSHA’s mission is to prevent construction accidents, industrial injuries, and other workplace accidents. It seeks to do this through setting and enforcing safety standards, designing and delivering education and training programs, and engaging in outreach activity.

Unfortunately, OSHA sometimes falls short of accomplishing its mission. For example, OSHA officials admitted in November 2011 that one of the ways the agency uses to monitor workplace safety – a database tracking workplace fatalities – is deficient in several key respects. OSHA’s lack of information is troubling because people need to know how many workplace deaths occur and the reasons for them in order to improve workplace safety.

Causes of Workplace Deaths

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), there were 4,547 workplace fatalities in 2010. Massachusetts saw 51 workplace fatalities in 2010, down from 59 in 2009. The BLS reported that the causes of deaths in the workplace for 2010 were:

- Transportation incidents – 39 percent

- Assaults and violent acts – 18 percent

- Contact with objects or equipment – 16 percent

- Falls – 14 percent

- Exposure to harmful substances – nine percent

- Fire or explosions – four percent

OSHA Database Failure

OSHA has a Voluntary Protection Program (VPP), wherein OSHA partners with employers who have injury and fatality rates below the BLS average for their industries. In exchange for proactively working on safety measures, the employers in the VPP are exempt from regular OSHA inspections.

One of the main deficits in OSHA’s workplace fatality data is that it does not include deaths that happened at employers in the VPP. By cross-referencing OSHA data and BLS data, the Center for Public Integrity discovered that OSHA data did not include 15 workplace fatalities that occurred between 2000 and 2010 because these deaths happened at VPP participant employers.

Another area in which OSHA does not have data is workplace fatalities that occur in the 21 states that administer their own version of OSHA’s VPP. These are major gaps in the database and make it difficult for OSHA to do its job properly.

OSHA officials say they are taking steps to fill the information gap regarding workplace fatalities in VPP participant employers. OSHA’s second-highest official concedes the importance of following up on fatalities at VPP participant employers and including that information in OSHA data. OSHA’s main office has issued memos on the topic to regional offices in the past few years.

Preventing Workplace Deaths

OSHA and employers can take steps to make the number of workplace deaths decrease further. Some ideas include:

- Make safety a key value for owners and managers

- Train employees in safety techniques

- Engage employees in making the workplace safer

- Monitor employees’ actions to ensure compliance with safety regulations

- Analyze “near-miss” accidents so that they do not happen again and to discover any safeguards that functioned properly to prevent fatalities